April 27, 2012

The Stargate TV and Movie Conspiracy: Stargate Atlantis, SG-1, and Universe


The original movie "Stargate" first came out in the year 1994. This movie was an instant classic. It spun off into a television series called Stargate SG-1. This is one of the most successful science fiction shows of all time, even surpassing X-files. Many people who love science fiction, like myself, can appreciate the fact that all of the scientific theories and laws of physics still hold true in the stargate universe.


We all know that with popular fictional television series based on real life scenarios, are actually just that. Real stories retold with key facts changed. For example you have television shows like Bones, or CSI that are incredibly accurate, and actually based on real situations. Sure character names are changed, but some of the spins and twists of the story just could not have been written. They are based on real stories. The reason I mention this is because Stargate SG-1 went on for 10 seasons. This is a lot of time to fill and they seem to do it easily, with every episode being filled with strange data, and hints of a universal intelligence.

Unlike Star Trek, or Star Wars there seemed to be more scientific explanations of both alien races, and alien technologies. I am not saying Star Trek wasn't extremely scientific in their approach, but it seems like a lot of Star Trek's scientific knowledge revolved around the "Enterprise" or their ship. Not much emphasis was put on the aliens, or their technology. Stargate seemed to get a little more specific about alien worlds in also. With so many episodes and seasons of Stargate one can't help but wonder where all of this information comes from.

In the original Stargate movie a circular stargate is found that contains symbols all around it. A character by the name of Dr. Daniel Jackson figured out how to use the stargate to dial other worlds by opening a wormhole using the stargate. The stargate locks symbols in a sequence, Dr. Jackson however figures out the 7th symbol which is actually the point of origin when dialing out. 


When Stargate SG-1 came out it takes place 1 year after the movie left off. The Stargate team gets in many adventures going to different planets using the 7 symbol aka chevron dialing system. I wonder if chevron has another meaning. Why were the symbols called chevrons?

In Stargate SG-1 the military gets a space battle cruiser called the Daedalus. It is operated by the United States military and on-board this ship they have a true Asgard alien, working as our ally. The Asgard aliens are one of the most advanced alien beings in the Stargate universe and have technology aboard the Daedalus which really makes this a formidable hyperspace capable space battle ship. It also has the ability to transport or "beam" a person or thing from one place to the other. This technology comes to the United States military and the Daedalus ship via the Asgards.


The Asgard race is benevolent and does not seem to be a threat to humans. That is of course according to the show. I find this to be very interesting. The main reason being is that the Asgard look very much like the alien grays that we hear are responsible for abductions, cattle mutilations, and crop circles. I've heard the grey aliens being called different things, but friendly is not one of them. The main thing to note about the Asgard, or the grey aliens is that they are definitely working along side high ranking military officials this is made very clear. Do you think our government really works along side these aliens? It makes you wonder what the conditions of that relationship, if any, are in real life. Does our real government make deals with these grey aliens? Do the grey aliens have an X amount of people that they can abduct, and perform experiments on with the permission of the government? This is all kind of scary and the stargate seems to be promoting the idea that aliens and the government have and will continue to work together with aliens without fully understanding their agenda. I do not think this is wise, but the bottom line is stargate hints to the fact that our government is working with the Greys in specific.


In Stargate Atlantis (the next show in the franchise), the Stargate team figures out an 8 chevron address. When they dial it they find themselves in the Pegasus galaxy on a planet, in the lost city of Atlantis. This is truly amazing to think about. Could the advanced civilization of Atlantis actually be found today? If they were really so advanced I see how a real stargate would help hide a whole civilization. Does our government have knowledge of stargate technology? Does superior ancient technology exist that could bring us closer to the stars? In stargate Atlantis you start to hear about the ancients. The ancients are an ancient alien race that built the city of Atlantis. They built the city 10,000 years before the stargate team arrives. In Stargate Atlantis they speak of the ancient aliens being able to reach ascension. This is where the ancients ascend to pure light energy. This is strange because people around the internet have spoken about the Council of Nine. I am not sure if this is true but contactees have claimed that they have received contact from the pleadian council which explains that we are entering a new stage of consciousness. They also speak of ascension.


That leaves us with Stargate Universe. The last show made in the stargate series. In this show Stargate command has found a 9 chevron address that requires a tremendous amount of power to dial. The stargate team given no other choice dials the address from a planet that has the adequate power, only to destroy the planet, and end up on an ancient alien ship known as "Destiny". Destiny is an alien ship that was created by the ancients much like the lost city of Atlantis. This ship is amazing. It contains its own stargate to access habitable worlds the ship may encounter. Destiny has the power to jump into hyperspace much like the Daedalus except unlike the Daedalus the Destiny was built by a far more advanced civilization than the Asgards. The ancients are the ones responsible for building the stargate. The ancients would put a stargate at all the planets of interest. After the crew of Destiny dialed its 9th chevron address they realized why the address took so much power to dial. This is because now they are stranded on the other side of the universe and cannot return to Earth. The purpose of Destiny's mission is to figure out clues of an even more advanced civilization that was here when the universe was created. Do you think that the creators of the stargate movie, and television shows might have some knowledge of top secret government stargate-like programs? I believe the reason why they allowed these television shows, and movies to be created was so that when they are spoken about in public everyone is quick to call it fantasy. What do you think? Let me know in the comments. Here are some interesting videos I found on YouTube about the Stargate subject.






**UPDATE**   I have recently learned that the United States Airforce was not only highly involved with the creation of this television series, but the lead actor was given a real Military rank of Brigadeer General by the United States Air Force. If you have Netflix I recommend you watch the episode called "Wormhole Xtreme" this is where they create a television show for plausible deniability from the United States Air Force. Could this be the true purpose of the Stargate series? Is the Stargate program infact real? Leave comments and let me know what you think.

Share : Share On Facebook ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Google Bookmark ! Send An Email !

April 2, 2012

Building 7, The 9-11 Truth Movement, and The Huge Skyscraper On Fire in Moscow, More Questions Than Answers

Building 7 right before collapse

The 9-11 truth movement has been happening for a very long time. While the towers went down, and later building 7, many people were already talking about how this was an inside job, and how they heard explosions in all buildings before they eventually came down. That very day people were speaking about this. The media coverage on the whole situation had sort of an eery script like presentation throughout the whole news reporting process on all channels. Almost as if this type of thing was being "practiced" or "rehearsed" before this disaster actually happened. I am not saying all news reporters knew that 9-11 would happen, and they did nothing about it, therefore there were no warnings to save any lives. That is not what I am saying at all. I am saying that all the major news outlets were probably practicing disaster drills, and live footage breakthroughs without knowing exactly what disaster was to come. Someone knew in the ranks of these news outlets such as CBS, NBC, and Fox news. I am sure of it.

Before you start thinking I am a 9-11 truther and that I am anti-government, I think you should hear me out first. I in no way ever sided with the 9-11 truth movement, and I am not anti-goverment, or anti-peace. I believe we must have a strong government that is aware of people's constitutional rights, both to be informed, and the right to free speech. This is what I am doing now, voicing some quick facts about the dreaded day. I always knew however something wasn't right about the information we were receiving live as the disasters were occurring.

I know what you're thinking. Why am I doing a post about 9/11 now? Why would I wait so long to voice on  opinion based on all the facts that are documented in the well known 9/11 commission report? Like I said I have never sided with the 9-11 truth movement because of lack of evidence, on both sides of the argument. You can only make an educated opinion based on knowledge that we learn throughout our time here on this Earth. This is why I bring it up now:

There has been a fire on a skyscraper in Moscow. It has been burning for almost 2 days and the fire has been put out. This was a HUGE fire, and they put it out by dumping water from the near by rivers onto the blaze to control it. Sure it was an ugly site, but the building was able to be salvaged. This building is the TALLEST skyscraper in Europe. So this skyscraper somehow was saved. When our buildings were burning (World Trade Center, Building 7) Why did we not have helicopters in the air? Why did we only have firemen that risk their lives to do something they obviously cannot tackle on their own. This I believe is the proof that the government had a different agenda. We had helicopters putting out dangerous forrest fires in Texas within hours of them starting to get out of control. The helicopters dumped water from nearby bodies of water. This seems like something they could have done during 9-11, but for some reason or another they just did not do it. Instead we had breaking news on every single channel, telling us about the horrific details of the entire situation. Where were the helicopters?

Another thing is this fire in Moscow on that skyscraper was burning like the fires of hell. The fire was very hot and took a long time before it was able to be put out and the building salvaged. If you look at footage of building 7 before the collapse you will quickly notice that any fire that could have brought down the building was simply not there. The official reason the 911 commission reports is that the building went down due to fire. This cannot be true. I want to share with you some other videos of fires burning in large sky scrapers all around the world and how they were saved. You will notice that none of these efforts were being executed during the 9-11 disaster. This is the proof, this cannot be denied. They must change their official story, it is obviously not JUST fire that brought down Building 7. You ready to see the proof? What I am about to show you are multiple sky scrapers all around the US that have had major fires in them, with very little media coverage (compared to 9/11) and were all taken care of and put out successfully thanks to the efforts of our government. Where were those efforts on 9/11. Not one helicopter in the sky.





This video is a fire that happened on a high rise in Los Angeles in May 4th, 1988. This fire was at First Interstate Bank, and it was on the 12th floor. This building did not collapse, and was put out successfully.




This skyscraper was burning in Houston Texas. The day it happened was August 30th, 2010. This building was successfully put out, and it did NOT collapse.




This was a scary fire. It was in Shanghai, and it burned for a long time. This building however, did NOT collapse.




South Korea even has problems with burning sky scrapers, and they still get their helicopters to put it out. Another thing to note is that this happened during an Earthquake. I know there are a lot of people out there that say because the fire in Building Seven was a fire in the lower part of the building, it compromised its structural integrity. This is total bullshit, and trust me a 7.0 Earthquake could cause just as much damage to any building's structural integrity, this building in Shanghai was also in fire. This building DID NOT collapse. Our Building 7 did.




There is no fire in any of these buildings, but this is a crazy earth quake. It causes many of the buildings to sway. This is in Japan. The earthquake was so powerful it was moving these buildings and doing the impossible. These buildings DID NOT collapse.



And this is our World Trade Center collapse. Pretty amazing. Any fire on that building could have and SHOULD have been contained. It was not. Instead people were being told to keep their distance, and to stay away. People could hear the explosions that were on site. This building was not hit by a plane. There is no jet fuel story they can say here. Nothing looked hot enough to heat steel. I am not an engineer but many professional engineers have spoken out about this demolition. In every suggestion from a professional engineer they will tell you WITHOUT A DOUBT, that it not only looks like, but IS a controlled demolition. You can see other videos of controlled demolitions on YouTube. If a building were to collapse by fire, you can bet the aftermath would have been much worse, and damaging to other buildings surrounding it. I have never done a post about 9/11, and both sides of the story. This is my first one, and I have done this article to show one key point in the argument that is not explained in the 9/11 commission report in truth. Am I a 9/11 was an inside job kind of guy? Depends who you call the inside, our government operates on multiple levels, and not everyone is to blame for keeping this awful secret, but someone needs to come forward with the real truth. The "truth" we have been given does not add up. It doesn't take a rocket scientist (or an engineer) to figure that out. Leave a comment and let me know what you think.

Share : Share On Facebook ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Google Bookmark ! Send An Email !

Like This Page on Facebook